![]() When playing FLAC, the PC is burdened with Extra processing on the fly, so probably my stand is techically justifiable Ofcourse you can easily convert from Flac to Wav BEFORE playback. ( I am sure many will disagree with me, but this is IMHO )Īgain regarding FLAC and WAV, I differ, I find WAV playback sounds just a touch better in all respects, compared to flac. I found Foobar 2000 to be the most neutral and open. all in the same performance categories, but each adding just a hint of their own flavour. It was like a comparison between different interconnects. I have had the good fortune of listening to HDD playback thru various software, and to my ears, each sounded different. I think he implied this when using the word 'also' but just to state the fact. MSB1 has considerable practical experience on this topic, as well as herculepirate. I am hoping to pick up some Gyan from Forum members. 2-4 minutes per CD - for CD's without scratches, etc. Using the ABX comparator in Foobar I have been unable to distinguish between the same track ripped in Wav or FLAC.ĭB is also faster in my computer than EAC. I prefer FLAC to WAV as FLAC files can be easily tagged unlike Wav's. I use DB poweramp and rip my CD's to FLAC lossless with 0 compression. If your rip differs from the database or your particular CD is not present in the database (extremely rare), DB will do a secure rip (multiple passes) to get the best out of your CD. ![]() Accuraterip is an online database of CD rips against which your rip is compared. I found DB poweramp easier to use plus it automatically downloads Album art.ĭB poweramp also uses Accuraterip. EAC is free, DB poweramp has to be bought, but its not expensive. EAC or DB poweramp are the 2 popular 'bit-perfect' rippers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |